Liberty is for me…

So, in Texas bigger is obviously better, well not in this case. Less would be preferred.

The San Antonio Express reports that Texans have paid $2.4 million dollars for shitty bureaucrats, Superintendents, to leave the school system.

Why should taxpayer money be used to compensate the departure of a shitty bureaucrat? Why not have their fancy union create a fund to support incompetent workers?

I tell ya government schools just love misspending my money and they recognize it too. Check this one liner.

“That’s money that could be going to educating children instead of going to pay off a superintendent,” said Lee Ann Ray, a former superintendent who co-authored a 2006 paper about Texas buyouts.

No shit, Sherlock.

She just goes on…

“There’s a catch-22 to that because there are cases when a superintendent is not being effective and, in that case, a buyout is appropriate,” she said.

What, catch-22! This should not be a catch-22, they need to fire ineffective Superintendents and not pay them.

This has to be a main reason why per pupil spending increases each year, buyouts are getting more expensive.

Is there a study by a think tank that links the two factors? If so, someone send it to me because I would love to read it.